In today’s world, a quiet revolution is unfolding—one that promises innovation but delivers control. Under the glossy label of “genetic engineering,” powerful corporations are reshaping the very foundation of life on Earth.
What appears to be scientific advancement is, in truth, a legal mechanism of unprecedented expropriation. A silent Trojan horse. And contrary to the marketed narrative, it doesn’t work—not in the way people are led to believe. It doesn’t benefit life, nature, or humanity. Instead, it benefits monopoly.
A remarkable exposé written by scientist Jordan Grant, originally published in the Dutch scientific journal Next Level, sheds light on this deception. Though only fragments have circulated widely, the message they carry is explosive, urgent, and deeply unsettling.
Genetic Engineering: A Sleight of Hand Disguised as Progress
Genetic engineering has been portrayed as the pinnacle of modern science—precise, safe, and revolutionary. But dig deeper, and the truth reveals itself: this technology is not about improving life. It’s about owning it.
Imagine waking up one day to discover that the food grown in your backyard, the seeds passed down through generations, or the plants naturally sprouting in your region are no longer yours. Why? Because someone somewhere claimed intellectual property rights over a piece of genetic code. A tomato, once part of the commons, is now a patented commodity. And so is your food sovereignty.
This is not an exaggeration. It is already happening.
The Myth of Scientific Precision
Genetic engineering is often sold as a “precision” technology—like editing text in a word processor. But real science tells a very different story. The human genome project and decades of molecular biology have revealed a chaotic landscape: genes are not fixed “blueprints,” but dynamic entities that change over time, even within the same organism.
Tools like CRISPR, celebrated as miracle scalpels of DNA, are in reality nothing more than crude chemical mechanisms based on probabilities. They are not precise; they are unpredictable. They can cause off-target effects, unintended mutations, and disruptions whose consequences are poorly understood.
This isn’t innovation—it’s biotechnological roulette.
Patents on Life: The True Goal
At the heart of genetic engineering lies one true objective: profit through ownership. By reclassifying life as a product of intellectual labor, corporations have begun patenting not only seeds and plants but microorganisms, animals, and even human genetic sequences.
This system doesn’t empower farmers. It enslaves them. Once farmers use patented seeds, they cannot reuse or share them. They must buy new seeds each season, often bundled with mandatory chemical treatments. Independence is replaced by dependency, and biodiversity gives way to uniform, fragile monocultures.
The real “engineering” here is not genetic. It is economic.
The Collapse of the Gene Theory
One of the most overlooked truths in biology today is that the concept of “genes” as discrete units of heredity is increasingly unscientific. Despite decades of research, no one has isolated a gene in the way textbooks describe. DNA itself is not a rigid instruction manual but a reactive molecule influenced by the environment, biochemistry, and unknown forces.
The gene theory, once revolutionary, is now deeply flawed and contradicted by evidence. It persists only because it supports a lucrative narrative—one that legitimizes the genetic patenting of all life forms under the guise of science.
Biochemistry and the Illusion of Control
Modern biochemistry is built on reductionist assumptions. Its explanatory models are often metaphysical rather than empirical—chemical tales dressed as truth. While chemical manipulation can certainly produce observable effects, the theoretical framework underpinning much of what is claimed about “how life works” is shaky at best.
Much like the alchemists and magicians of old, today’s bio-scientists mix molecules and tell grand stories. But now, the stakes are global. These stories are used to justify monopolistic laws, manipulate public perception, and suppress dissent.
It is no longer just about science. It is about shaping reality itself.
GMO and the Myth of Genetic Modification
Let’s get something straight: so-called genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are not miracles of genetic insight. They are products of accelerated breeding—achieved through aggressive chemical treatments, radiation exposure, and brute-force manipulation. This is not elegant science. It is industrial interference.
The inherited traits produced through such methods are not new—they are simply the result of environmental stressors forcing rapid adaptation. What’s more, the controversy surrounding GMO “safety” has been amplified deliberately to divert public focus from the deeper deception: the myth of genetic engineering as a precise and reliable science.
Stories of cloning and genome editing—such as Dolly the sheep or the edited Chinese twins—are media spectacles, carefully crafted to uphold the illusion of genetic control. They serve the same narrative function as past tales of moon landings: symbols of technological triumph masking geopolitical motives.
The Real Endgame: Patenting People and Nature
Jordan Grant’s insight cuts deeper than most. This deception is not limited to crops or livestock. It extends to people. The idea of a “patented human genome” is no longer the realm of science fiction—it is a legal possibility.
If a human genome is patented, the individual encoded by that genome becomes, by legal definition, intellectual property. And this framework is already being constructed, under the radar. Every DNA test, every genome sequence stored by biotech firms, contributes to a growing database of claimable life.
This is not theoretical. It is happening now.
The Hidden Agenda Behind Genetic Testing
DNA tests, PCR diagnostics, and other biotech “tools” are revered as miracles of modern medicine. But what if they are nothing more than legitimizing instruments for a deeper agenda?
Despite their scientific aura, these tests are built on questionable foundations. The assumptions behind what DNA even is are unsettled, and the alleged “discovery” of genes remains unverified. These tests are not neutral. They are gateways—designed to gather data, establish legal frameworks, and normalize the commodification of life.
A Call to Question and Resist
It is time to stop blindly accepting the genetic narrative. To question the epistemology of molecular biology. To recognize that what we’re dealing with is not harmless science—but a global model of resource domination disguised as innovation.
The vocabulary may be modern, but the agenda is ancient: control.
Food is not a commodity. Life is not intellectual property. And nature does not belong to corporations.
Only a deeply informed public can resist this new form of tyranny—one that doesn’t arrive with tanks, but patents.
