According to experts, climate change will lead to “millions” of deaths, flooding of large European cities, nuclear war and global environmental unrest … and all this will happen over the next 5 days.
The Guardian, February 22, 2004: Climate change over the next 20 years could lead to a global catastrophe that will kill millions as a result of wars and natural disasters.
A secret report, which was hidden by the chiefs of defense of the USA and received by The Observer, warns that large European cities will be flooded under the rising sea levels, and Britain will plunge into a “Siberian” climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and riots will erupt around the world ….
The paper predicts that dramatic climate change could bring the planet to the brink of anarchy as countries launch a nuclear war to protect declining supplies of food, water and energy. The threat of global stability significantly overshadows the threat of terrorism …
The report was prepared by Andrew Marshall, an influential Pentagon defense adviser, who has had a significant impact on US military thinking over the past three decades. He was the man behind a broad recent review aimed at transforming the US military under Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
Pentagon experts believe the inevitable scenario of catastrophic climate change is “plausible and could jeopardize United States national security in ways that should be taken into account immediately.”
According to the report, more people are living on the planet than it can handle. By 2020, the “catastrophic” shortage of water and energy supply will be increasingly difficult to overcome, plunging the planet into war. The potential consequences of rapid climate change will create global chaos.
Thus, according to the report, the UK is only 5 days from plunging into the “Siberian climate”, and millions of people are about to die in a giant nuclear slaughter caused by food shortages in the world and droughts.
Mr. Paul Joseph Watson, whose article of December 27 is now reprinted by many publications, writes about everything with certain elements of banter. And banter to some extent, is justified.
When conspiracy theorists spill out something about the fall of a giant asteroid, about a nuclear war, about a giant raised flag with a nuclear bomb in an explosion in Seattle, and then it does not come true – the public starts throwing tomatoes at the conspiracy theorists and recommends wearing foil caps. However, why isn’t the public screaming now? This is the report of world scientific luminaries, which the Pentagon accepted as a guide to action. Well, where is the Siberian climate in Britain? Where is the flooding of the continents? Why doesn’t anyone throw tomatoes at The Observer and shout that “you are a yellow press!”?
Mr. Paul Joseph Watson, on the other hand, is a man who claims to be telling the truth, the truth alone and only the truth, but is actually a guy who is more or less engaged. His task is to scold Pentagon analysts who made the wrong prediction in 2004. But is this forecast wrong?
If Mr. Paul Joseph Watson opened his eyes a little, he would see that the forecast, which, incidentally, was given before 2024, comes true before our eyes. Is there any kind of madness with the climate? But what about – just look at the thermometer and the calendar. Hunger, crop failure? We won’t even repeat here | everywhere everything either dries up or freezes; in the USA, the export of foodstuffs from the harvest of 2019 will be zero. Cooling in Europe. Warming in Greenland. Riots around the world – in Paris for a year now, but Mr. Paul Joseph Watson for some reason does not see them. Conflicts around gas pipelines. Conflict India / Pakistan. Conflict Israel / Iran. Time bomb in North Korea. Is this not enough?
We would now say that the forecast for the 2004 sample was just excellent, that it was written by geniuses, because, despite such a long period of the forecast, it came true and continues to come true. But in reality, genius is hardly likely to appear here, and rather, it is a question of some kind of information that was closed to the public, which analysts had.
For example, information about the pole shift, which by the year 2004 had already been roughly calculated. Or information about the arrival of Nibiru, which NASA has been following since the early 1990s. By 2004, everything that happened next became clear, but since it was impossible to say directly about the pole shift (Nibiru?), They simply brought a “scientific report” to the Pentagon, which described what would happen, but did not reveal the reason for what was happening.
Based on this, we, of course, do not think that Britain will turn into Siberia in exactly 5 days, but until the end of the forecast, oh, there is still a long way to go and in these four years, Britain may not only turn into the tundra, but also into glass. Everything, as they say, is still ahead of everyone, so we are following the development of events.
